Summary
- Multichain systems are inherently asynchronous: messages and assets move on separate timelines.
-
Runespear solves this by:
- Standardizing cross‑chain messages
- Piggybacking full state snapshots on every message
- Using a conservative accounting model that avoids double counting
- SuperEarn is built so that asset safety and correctness come first, even in the face of delays or partial failures in CCIP or bridges.
1. Why Multichain Is Hard
When SuperEarn uses more than one blockchain (for example, Kaia for the user interface and Ethereum for deep liquidity), two things travel separately:- Messages – “Do this action” (deposit, withdraw, update state)
- Assets – USDT/USDC actually moving through a bridge
- Don’t arrive at the same time
- Can be delayed, retried, or temporarily fail independently
- May be processed in slightly different orders on each chain
- Temporary double counting of assets (appearing in two places)
- Confusing balances if a message or bridge transfer is delayed
- Fragile systems that “freeze” if one chain or service is slow
2. What Is Runespear?
Runespear is a standardized messaging layer that sits between SuperEarn’s vaults and the cross‑chain infrastructure, built on top of Chainlink CCIP. At a high level, it:- Lets chains send clear, typed instructions to each other (e.g., “these many assets were bridged”, “withdrawal confirmed”)
- Attaches a full state snapshot to every message, so each side always has an up‑to‑date picture of the system
- Automatically handles retries and failed messages instead of silently breaking
3. Safety Goals
Runespear and the SuperEarn V2 architecture are designed with a few clear goals:- Never lose or double‑count funds: Total assets across chains should always be mathematically consistent, even during bridge transfers.
- Stay safe under delays or outages: If CCIP or a bridge is slow, the system uses the last safe data and corrects itself as soon as new information arrives.
- Avoid “stop‑the‑world” behavior: User‑facing functions like reading your balance should never have to “wait” on another chain to respond.
- Minimize trust assumptions: Runespear treats both CCIP and bridges as external infrastructure and is designed to remain safe even if they delay or fail to call back.
4. Two Rails, One Coherent Picture
SuperEarn’s cross‑chain design separates responsibilities into layers:- Vaults (per chain) – Hold and manage funds on each chain
- Message Agent – Translates vault actions into cross‑chain messages
- Crosschain Adapter – Talks to CCIP and the native bridge
- Runespear / CCIP + Bridge – The actual infrastructure that transports messages and assets
- Vaults only deal with local, verified balances
- Runespear and the adapter are responsible for keeping both sides in sync over time
5. State Snapshots on Every Message
The most important safety feature is “universal state piggybacking.” Every Runespear message carries:- The action (for example, “bridge complete”, “sync balances”)
-
A state snapshot of what the sending chain currently believes:
- How many assets are held in the vault
- What’s currently in transit via the bridge
- Relevant timestamps and markers
- If a message is delayed or lost, the next message still contains a fresh snapshot.
- The system doesn’t need to “chain” updates in a perfect order; it always overwrites with the latest known truth.
- This makes the system self‑correcting – it naturally converges back to correct accounting as soon as messages resume.
6. Correct Balances Without Freezing the System
In cross‑chain systems, there’s a tempting but dangerous idea:“Don’t let anyone move until we get fresh data from the other chain.”This “stop‑the‑world” approach is not what SuperEarn does. It would:
- Make basic reads (like
totalAssets) slow or unreliable - Force every call to wait on external systems
- Break integrations with other protocols that expect instant, read‑only functions
- Trusts local, on‑chain data first: Each chain knows exactly how much it holds locally.
- Combines it with the latest snapshot from the other chain: Using the state snapshots carried by Runespear messages.
- Avoids double counting “in‑flight” transfers: During bridging, some assets are moving between chains. SuperEarn’s accounting model detects and subtracts this overlap so the same funds are never counted twice.
- Never blocks user‑facing reads: Even if messages are temporarily delayed, balance queries still return immediately, using the last safe, conservative data.
- Imagine two branches of the same bank.
- Each branch keeps its own local ledger, and they periodically reconcile.
- You can still withdraw from your branch even if the other branch is slow to respond.
- Over time, the ledgers converge and every unit of money is accounted for.
7. How Runespear Handles Failure Scenarios
Here’s how the system behaves under common “bad” conditions:7.1 Message Delays or Loss
If a CCIP/Runespear message is delayed or fails:- The system stores information about the failed message for inspection and possible retry.
- Later messages still carry full snapshots, which allow the system to resync correctly.
- User‑facing views remain available, using the last safe state.
7.2 Bridge Congestion or Outage
If the native bridge between chains is slow or temporarily down:- Transfers in progress are tracked in a bridge queue and via the accounting layer.
- Assets are not assumed “arrived” until the system can clearly see them on the target chain.
- Total assets remain mathematically consistent; at worst, some funds are treated as “in transit” for longer.
7.3 Remote Chain Issues
If the remote chain is congested or temporarily unavailable:- Origin‑side operations that depend on remote info can become more conservative, but do not corrupt accounting.
- Once Runespear messages resume, the new snapshots automatically reconcile any missed intermediate steps.
8. What This Means for Users
From a user’s perspective:- You simply deposit on Kaia, yields are generated across chains, and you withdraw back to Kaia.
-
Behind the scenes, Runespear:
- Keeps the different chains in sync using state snapshots
- Handles delays, retries, and ordering issues
- Makes sure your funds aren’t under-counted or “lost in transit”
- Balances might be slightly conservative for short periods during heavy cross‑chain activity.
-
But they are designed to be:
- Safe – never overstated or double‑counted
- Eventually exact – they converge to the true value once all messages and transfers settle